On the 2016 Referendum
The City of Atlanta is about to decide on projects to be executed should a MARTA 0.5% sales tax and a city 0.5% TSPLOST sales tax be approved by the residents in November 2016, for a total of up to 1% increase. It is important that the projects enable a competitive transit offering in order to attract ridership.City officials like to speak about how transportation, and public transit in particular, is an "instrument" for "equity, mobility, and prosperity," and that the anticipated growth of Atlanta to 1 million inhabitants can be fostered if planners can get people out their cars to get around.
The list of MARTA projects calls for several new streetcar and strengthened bus service. The list of city projects includes multi-use trails, street makeovers (as "complete streets" or "neighborhood greenways"), and more, especially around existing transit centers. If specified and executed well, these projects will dramatically improve the transit landscape in Atlanta.
On the need for competitiveness
I said at a recent public hearing that it is really important that the projects make transit a competitive travel option. Let's examine two recent transit projects in Atlanta that have not been executed to the fullest potential, do not provide a competitive offer, and failed the ridership test. I have highlighted the shortcomings points in red.Atlanta Streetcar
- Length: 2.7 miles for entire loop.
- Distinctive signage and branding.
- Service: every 15 minutes 6am-10pm.
- Average speed including stops and traffic lights: 6 mph. 30-40 minutes to ride entire loop.
- Separate $1 fare using MARTA Breeze system. Partner transfers not accepted and not issued.
- Shared right-of-way with automobile traffic.
- Extended waits at traffic signals.
- Disruptions from multiple crashes involving cars at fault.
MARTA "Q" Bus on Memorial Drive (2009-2011 - Discontinued)
- Length: 6 miles.
- Service: Every 10 minutes rush hour only.
- Average speed: unknown.
- Limited number of stops.
- No distinctive markings, signage, or amenities (fleet or shelters).
- Shared right-of-way with automobile traffic.
- 2 protected intersections with green light extension and queue jumper lanes (no priority for red lights).
- Extended waits at most traffic signals.
My plea for the referendum projects
The projects must include good performance metrics in order to avoid the fiascos of the Atlanta Streetcar or the defunct MARTA Memorial Drive Q Bus.
If streetcars or bus-rapid-transit lines are built, they must provide the following in my opinion:
- Dedicated right-of-way,
- Reasonable spacing between stations,
- Reasonable travel speeds between stations,
- Minimal time wasted in mixed traffic and traffic lights,
- Frequency so that captive ridership is confident they don't have to deal with long waits if they wanted to try the streetcars,
- Electronic signs on platforms with real-time arrivals,
- Signage, maps, and branding on par with the premium service offered.
- Beautiful street redesign that encourages walking around the stations.
- Increased travel speeds compared to current service, with minimal time wasted at traffic lights,
- Reasonable spacing between stops,
- Shelters, benches, and pedestrian amenities at/near most stops,
- Frequency so that captive ridership is confident they don't have to deal with long waits if they wanted to try the arterial bus service,
- Signage, maps, and branding on par with the premium service offered.
Conclusion
If done well, the new transit projects that will come from the MARTA referendum will drastically improve the image of public transit in Atlanta. That includes setting a new standard for transit frequency, travel speeds, and signage. Officials will only have one shot at executing the projects, and it is really important that the resulting offering be competitive to attract riders who would otherwise drive.